VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS).
VEUR.AS and IMAE.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VEUR.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on May 21, 2013. IMAE.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both VEUR.AS and IMAE.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VEUR.AS or IMAE.AS.
Key characteristics
| VEUR.AS | IMAE.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.73% | 10.42% |
| 1Y Return | 15.30% | 15.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.50% | 6.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.29% | 8.32% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.94% | 6.84% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.56 | 1.55 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.49% | 10.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.63% | -35.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.82% | -1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEUR.AS and IMAE.AS is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VEUR.AS having a 10.73% return and IMAE.AS slightly lower at 10.42%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEUR.AS having a 6.94% annualized return and IMAE.AS not far behind at 6.84%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEUR.AS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IMAE.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Dividend Comparison
VEUR.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while IMAE.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEUR.AS Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF | 2.96% | 3.00% | 3.32% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 3.24% | 3.62% | 3.05% | 3.19% | 3.13% | 3.79% | 0.94% |
IMAE.AS iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEUR.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, roughly equal to the maximum IMAE.AS drawdown of -35.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUR.AS and IMAE.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VEUR.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.