VEUA.L vs. UC96.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L).
VEUA.L and UC96.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VEUA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. UC96.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. It was launched on Aug 26, 2015. Both VEUA.L and UC96.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VEUA.L or UC96.L.
Performance
VEUA.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEUA.L achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than UC96.L's 13.19% return.
VEUA.L
4.05%
-3.10%
-5.04%
9.83%
6.80%
N/A
UC96.L
13.19%
0.39%
5.46%
18.83%
11.84%
N/A
Key characteristics
| VEUA.L | UC96.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.86 | 1.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.26 | 2.63 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.32 | 3.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.63 | 9.76 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.36% | 1.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.02% | 10.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.45% | -26.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.50% | -1.31% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VEUA.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEUA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between VEUA.L and UC96.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VEUA.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VEUA.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison
VEUA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEUA.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.66% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
VEUA.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEUA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.45%, which is greater than UC96.L's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUA.L and UC96.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VEUA.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that VEUA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC96.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.