VEU vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
VEU and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VEU is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World ex US Index. It was launched on Mar 2, 2007. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both VEU and VPL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VEU or VPL.
Key characteristics
VEU | VPL | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 6.15% | 2.79% |
1Y Return | 13.39% | 10.46% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 0.62% | -0.52% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.31% | 3.85% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 4.84% | 4.85% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.02 | 0.69 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.48 | 1.04 |
Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.11 | 0.69 |
Martin Ratio | 5.38 | 3.23 |
Ulcer Index | 2.40% | 3.23% |
Daily Std Dev | 12.64% | 15.03% |
Max Drawdown | -61.52% | -55.49% |
Current Drawdown | -7.87% | -8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEU and VPL is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VEU vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than VPL's 2.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEU having a 4.84% annualized return and VPL not far ahead at 4.85%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VEU vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEU has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VEU vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VEU vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than VPL's 3.14% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 3.01% | 3.32% | 3.12% | 3.07% | 2.00% | 3.10% | 3.27% | 2.66% | 2.96% | 2.95% | 3.52% | 2.66% |
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.14% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% | 2.69% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
VEU vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and VPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VEU vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) have volatilities of 3.86% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.