PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEU vs. VPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEU vs. VPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 21.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEU having a 9.63% annualized return and VPL not far behind at 9.50%.


VEU

1D
0.45%
1M
0.29%
6M
7.13%
YTD
13.83%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
9.63%
ALL TIME*
5.48%

VPL

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.92%
6M
11.30%
YTD
21.47%
1Y
38.65%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
9.50%
ALL TIME*
6.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$232.81M$239.63M$222.48M
$39.40M$44.46M$59.50M

VEU vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
13.83%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
21.47%32.66%1.68%15.58%-15.20%1.10%16.65%18.16%-14.40%28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VEU and VPL is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2007

0.90

The correlation between VEU and VPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEU vs. VPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEU
VPL

Technology

23.2%
31.6%

Financial Services

23.1%
17.8%

Industrials

14.7%
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
8.8%

Healthcare

6.8%
4.3%

Basic Materials

6.5%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.2%

Energy

4.3%
1.1%

Communication Services

4.2%
4.4%

Utilities

3.0%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.6%

Technology

VEU
23.2%
VPL
31.6%

Financial Services

VEU
23.1%
VPL
17.8%

Industrials

VEU
14.7%
VPL
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VEU
7.6%
VPL
8.8%

Healthcare

VEU
6.8%
VPL
4.3%

Basic Materials

VEU
6.5%
VPL
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

VEU
4.9%
VPL
3.2%

Energy

VEU
4.3%
VPL
1.1%

Communication Services

VEU
4.2%
VPL
4.4%

Utilities

VEU
3.0%
VPL
1.3%

Real Estate

VEU
1.8%
VPL
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEU vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VPL
VPL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VEU vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEUVPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.91

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

8.80

+0.51

VEU vs. VPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the VPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEU and VPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEU vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and VPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEUVPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.52%

-55.49%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-13.33%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-16.35%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-31.09%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-33.90%

-1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-9.04%

+6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-11.59%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

4.40%

-1.28%

Volatility

VEU vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) is 5.32%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that VEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEUVPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

9.21%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

21.71%

-6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

23.81%

-6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

18.35%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.73%

-0.65%

VEU vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEU vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison

VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than VPL's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.54%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
2.76%4.01%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.84%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VEU and VPL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VPL has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to VEU (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs VPL's -55.49%.

On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 9.63% vs 9.50% for VPL. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VPL.

VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.54% for VEU.

VEU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VPL is Asia Pacific Equities. VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.08% for VPL.

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEU and VPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer