PortfoliosLab logo
VET vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VET and QQQM is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VET vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VET:

-0.89

QQQM:

0.63

Sortino Ratio

VET:

-1.30

QQQM:

0.93

Omega Ratio

VET:

0.83

QQQM:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

VET:

-0.53

QQQM:

0.60

Martin Ratio

VET:

-1.72

QQQM:

1.95

Ulcer Index

VET:

26.79%

QQQM:

7.01%

Daily Std Dev

VET:

50.28%

QQQM:

25.29%

Max Drawdown

VET:

-96.42%

QQQM:

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

VET:

-84.80%

QQQM:

-3.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VET achieves a -29.97% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 1.73% return.


VET

YTD

-29.97%

1M

7.96%

6M

-35.11%

1Y

-44.64%

3Y*

-31.17%

5Y*

7.31%

10Y*

-13.30%

QQQM

YTD

1.73%

1M

9.14%

6M

2.19%

1Y

15.73%

3Y*

19.83%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vermilion Energy Inc.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VET vs. QQQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VET is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VET is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VET is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VET is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VET is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VET is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQM is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQM is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VET vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VET Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VET and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

VET vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

VET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than QQQM's 0.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
5.38%3.71%2.48%1.65%0.00%9.60%12.73%10.17%5.48%4.62%7.45%5.20%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.58%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VET vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VET drawdown since its inception was -96.42%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VET and QQQM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

VET vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 5.59%. This indicates that VET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...