PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VERA vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VERA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERA achieves a -36.61% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return.


VERA

1D
-2.87%
1M
-22.09%
6M
-25.80%
YTD
-36.61%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.95%

SMH

1D
0.30%
1M
-8.74%
6M
33.97%
YTD
50.09%
1Y
90.95%
3Y*
50.56%
5Y*
33.46%
10Y*
34.16%
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.28B$7.64B$7.07B
$57.93M$92.77M$65.17M

VERA vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
-36.61%19.74%174.97%-20.52%-27.58%134.18%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
50.09%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VERA and SMH is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VERA vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VERA
VERA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VERA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VERA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VERA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VERASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.58

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

14.64

-12.23

VERA vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERA and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VERA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERA drawdown since its inception was -84.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERA and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VERASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.89%

-84.96%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.85%

-24.62%

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.09%

-35.74%

-26.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.89%

-45.30%

-39.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.34%

-19.19%

-23.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-40.89%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.66%

6.01%

+16.65%

Volatility

VERA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have volatilities of 14.46% and 14.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VERASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.46%

14.70%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.78%

33.13%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.96%

38.57%

+20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.98%

36.50%

+53.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.57%

33.32%

+57.25%

Dividends

VERA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

VERA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VERA and SMH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to VERA (14.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERA dropped -84.89% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VERA and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer