VERA vs. CDNS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).

Performance

VERA vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VERA vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VERA Vera Therapeutics, Inc.	-20.02%	19.74%	174.97%	-20.52%	-27.58%	132.35%
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc.	-10.36%	4.03%	10.31%	69.55%	-13.80%	49.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VERA : $2.60B CDNS : $76.47B
EPS VERA : -$4.68 CDNS : $4.06
PB Ratio VERA : 4.30 CDNS : 10.76
Total Revenue (TTM) VERA : $0.00 CDNS : $5.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) VERA : $0.00 CDNS : $5.09B
EBITDA (TTM) VERA : -$315.47M CDNS : $1.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERA achieves a -20.02% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's -10.36% return.

VERA

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: -20.02%
• 6M: 40.67%
• 1Y: 83.92%
• 3Y*: 73.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CDNS

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: -10.36%
• 6M: -20.39%
• 1Y: 8.27%
• 3Y*: 10.07%
• 5Y*: 14.64%
• 10Y*: 28.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VERA vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERA

VERA Risk / Return Rank: 74
VERA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VERA Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
VERA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VERA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VERA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CDNS

CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 47
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERA vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VERA	CDNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.21	+0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	0.60	+1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.08	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	0.36	+1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	0.80	+2.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VERA vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERA Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERA and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VERA	CDNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.21	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.22	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between VERA and CDNS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VERA vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither VERA nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VERA vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERA drawdown since its inception was -84.89%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERA and CDNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VERA	CDNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.89%	-93.13%	+8.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.83%	-28.09%	-11.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.25%	-24.96%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.29%	-39.79%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.24%	12.71%	+8.53%

Volatility

VERA vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.54%. This indicates that VERA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VERA	CDNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.53%	7.54%	+5.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.63%	25.41%	+18.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	94.76%	39.60%	+55.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.50%	35.24%	+57.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.50%	33.42%	+59.08%

Financials