PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDE vs. VAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDE vs. VAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than VAW's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 9.70%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.


VDE

1D
1.13%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
32.24%
6M
29.32%
1Y
45.53%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
20.43%
10Y*
9.70%

VAW

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.57%
YTD
13.17%
6M
16.23%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDE vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
32.24%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
13.17%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VDE and VAW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between VDE and VAW has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDE vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDE
VAW

Energy

99.5%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.4%
90.2%

Industrials

0.1%
1.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

VDE
99.5%
VAW
0.5%

Basic Materials

VDE
0.4%
VAW
90.2%

Industrials

VDE
0.1%
VAW
1.0%

Communication Services

VDE

-

VAW

-

Consumer Cyclical

VDE

-

VAW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VDE

-

VAW
0.0%

Financial Services

VDE

-

VAW

-

Healthcare

VDE

-

VAW
0.5%

Real Estate

VDE

-

VAW

-

Technology

VDE

-

VAW
0.1%

Utilities

VDE

-

VAW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDE vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDE vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDEVAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

1.70

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

5.56

+5.86

VDE vs. VAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the VAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDE and VAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDEVAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.29

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.30

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.49

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.39

-0.11

Drawdowns

VDE vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than VAW's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and VAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDEVAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.20%

-62.17%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-13.42%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-23.21%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-25.50%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.29%

-41.13%

-28.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-3.79%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-9.63%

-10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

4.09%

-0.09%

Volatility

VDE vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) at 6.08%. This indicates that VDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDEVAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

6.08%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

13.93%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

17.65%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.40%

19.62%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

21.20%

+8.73%

VDE vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDE vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison

VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than VAW's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.37%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDE and VAW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDE has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to VAW (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs VAW's -62.17%.

On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 10.35% vs 9.70% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 10.35% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.

VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VAW is Materials. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.10% for VAW.

VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDE and VAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer