VCR vs. VONG
VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VCR returned 13.68%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VCR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
VCR vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 13.68%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.
VCR
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 6M
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 8.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
VONG
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
VCR vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.41% | 5.77% | 24.27% | 40.38% | -35.15% | 24.86% | 48.36% | 27.45% | -2.31% | 22.82% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 1.56% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and VONG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VCR and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCR vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
VCR
VONG
VCR vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VCR | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 1.12 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.57 | 3.64 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VCR vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCR | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.54% | -32.72% | -28.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -16.23% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -23.27% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.20% | -32.72% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | -32.72% | -6.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -6.82% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -4.88% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 4.97% | +0.14% |
Volatility
VCR vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have volatilities of 6.34% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCR | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 6.04% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 12.59% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 16.17% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 21.45% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 20.92% | +1.52% |
VCR vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCR vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCR and VONG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCR has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to VONG (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.39% vs 13.68% for VCR. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCR.
VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.
VCR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.06% for VONG.
VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCR and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer