PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCR vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCR vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 13.55%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


VCR

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.97%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
13.55%

VONG

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.89%
YTD
8.61%
6M
7.89%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.01%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
8.61%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and VONG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.85

The correlation between VCR and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCR vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRVONGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.85

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

2.50

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.32

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.79

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.28

6.02

-3.73

VCR vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.85

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.75

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.90

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.90

-0.40

Drawdowns

VCR vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.54%

-32.72%

-28.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-16.23%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-23.27%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-32.72%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

-32.72%

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-0.35%

-4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-4.88%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

4.83%

+0.13%

Volatility

VCR vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 3.23%. This indicates that VCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

3.23%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

11.53%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

15.32%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

21.33%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

20.87%

+1.54%

VCR vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCR vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than VONG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.42%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCR and VONG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCR has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to VONG (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 13.55% for VCR. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCR.

VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.

VCR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.06% for VONG.

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCR and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer