VCR vs. TAN
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN).
VCR and TAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. TAN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 15, 2008. Both VCR and TAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VCR or TAN.
Performance
VCR vs. TAN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than TAN's -35.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has outperformed TAN with an annualized return of 13.78%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively lower 0.55% annualized return.
VCR
18.75%
6.46%
16.67%
29.90%
15.83%
13.78%
TAN
-35.69%
-9.11%
-19.48%
-24.49%
4.37%
0.55%
Key characteristics
| VCR | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | -0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.23 | -0.79 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 0.91 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.42 | -0.31 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.18 | -1.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.50% | 21.21% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.73% | 40.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.54% | -95.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.91% | -84.32% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCR vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and TAN is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VCR vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VCR vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than TAN's 0.14% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.76% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.84% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.70% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
VCR vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and TAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VCR vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is 6.52%, while Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a volatility of 16.04%. This indicates that VCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.