PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCR vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCR vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 44.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 13.55%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.30% annualized return.


VCR

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.97%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
13.55%

ICLN

1D
3.08%
1M
13.37%
YTD
44.55%
6M
43.15%
1Y
92.13%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.01%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
44.55%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and ICLN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.60

The correlation between VCR and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCR vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRICLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

3.54

-2.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

4.18

-3.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.52

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

8.11

-7.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.28

23.13

-20.84

VCR vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRICLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

3.54

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.11

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

-0.07

+0.58

Drawdowns

VCR vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.54%

-87.15%

+25.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-11.22%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-43.18%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-57.16%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

-66.75%

+27.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-35.33%

+30.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-66.62%

+57.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

3.93%

+1.03%

Volatility

VCR vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is 5.22%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that VCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

9.01%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

20.18%

-7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

26.22%

-7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

27.19%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

27.19%

-4.78%

VCR vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCR vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than ICLN's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.13%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCR and ICLN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICLN has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to VCR (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs ICLN's -87.15%.

On 10-year performance, VCR leads with 13.55% vs 12.30% for ICLN. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCR has performed better with a 13.55% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ICLN.

ICLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.73% for VCR.

VCR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.46% for ICLN.

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCR and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer