VCLT vs. VTV
VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCLT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VCLT returned 2.31%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for VTV. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
VCLT vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCLT achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VCLT has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 2.31%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
VCLT vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 13.27% | 23.89% | -7.04% | 11.70% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCLT and VTV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009 | -0.02 |
The correlation between VCLT and VTV shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCLT vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
VCLT
VTV
VCLT vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCLT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.47 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 4.15 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | 15.69 | -12.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCLT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.61 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.81 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.75 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.51 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
VCLT vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCLT drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLT and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCLT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -59.27% | +24.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.25% | -6.35% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -14.52% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.31% | -17.04% | -17.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.31% | -36.78% | +2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.36% | 0.00% | -14.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -7.87% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.68% | +0.45% |
Volatility
VCLT vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) is 2.31%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that VCLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCLT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 2.52% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.75% | 7.55% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 10.11% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 13.88% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 16.67% | -3.83% |
VCLT vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VCLT and VTV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCLT vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.55% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCLT and VTV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to VCLT (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLT dropped -34.31% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 2.31% for VCLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VCLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCLT and VTV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.
VCLT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCLT and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer