PortfoliosLab logo
VCEL vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VCEL and COST is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

VCEL vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vericel Corporation (VCEL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-96.39%
11,575.61%
VCEL
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VCEL:

-0.34

COST:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

VCEL:

-0.24

COST:

2.19

Omega Ratio

VCEL:

0.97

COST:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

VCEL:

-0.16

COST:

2.09

Martin Ratio

VCEL:

-0.93

COST:

6.15

Ulcer Index

VCEL:

16.56%

COST:

5.87%

Daily Std Dev

VCEL:

44.82%

COST:

22.01%

Max Drawdown

VCEL:

-99.88%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

VCEL:

-97.13%

COST:

-6.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VCEL:

$1.95B

COST:

$450.29B

EPS

VCEL:

$0.20

COST:

$17.15

PE Ratio

VCEL:

194.75

COST:

59.18

PEG Ratio

VCEL:

0.00

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

VCEL:

8.30

COST:

1.71

PB Ratio

VCEL:

6.74

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

VCEL:

$185.94M

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VCEL:

$136.75M

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

VCEL:

$18.96M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCEL achieves a -26.30% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VCEL has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 28.64%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 23.52% annualized return.


VCEL

YTD

-26.30%

1M

1.43%

6M

-15.76%

1Y

-18.28%

5Y*

21.76%

10Y*

28.64%

COST

YTD

10.18%

1M

11.05%

6M

12.27%

1Y

31.25%

5Y*

29.15%

10Y*

23.52%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VCEL vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCEL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VCEL is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VCEL is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VCEL is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VCEL is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VCEL is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VCEL is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VCEL vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vericel Corporation (VCEL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VCEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCEL and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.41
1.43
VCEL
COST

Dividends

VCEL vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

VCEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VCEL
Vericel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

VCEL vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCEL drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCEL and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-97.13%
-6.35%
VCEL
COST

Volatility

VCEL vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Vericel Corporation (VCEL) has a higher volatility of 18.76% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 8.28%. This indicates that VCEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.76%
8.28%
VCEL
COST

Financials

VCEL vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vericel Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
75.38M
63.72B
(VCEL) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VCEL vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vericel Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
77.6%
15.1%
(VCEL) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
VCEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vericel Corporation reported a gross profit of 58.50M and revenue of 75.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.6%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

VCEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vericel Corporation reported an operating income of 18.48M and revenue of 75.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.5%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

VCEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vericel Corporation reported a net income of 19.81M and revenue of 75.38M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.