PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCDAX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCDAX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares (VCDAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCDAX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VCDAX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.75%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.96% annualized return.


VCDAX

1D
1.78%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
0.33%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
13.75%

VGT

1D
0.39%
1M
4.11%
YTD
28.03%
6M
26.85%
1Y
54.06%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
25.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCDAX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCDAX
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.33%5.66%24.37%40.40%-35.17%26.20%48.18%27.55%-2.26%22.83%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
28.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VCDAX and VGT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between VCDAX and VGT has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VCDAX vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VCDAX
VGT

Consumer Cyclical

96.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%

-

Technology

1.0%
98.5%

Industrials

0.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

0.3%
0.5%

Energy

0.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

VCDAX
96.3%
VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

VCDAX
1.3%
VGT

-

Technology

VCDAX
1.0%
VGT
98.5%

Industrials

VCDAX
0.9%
VGT
0.4%

Communication Services

VCDAX
0.3%
VGT
0.5%

Energy

VCDAX
0.1%
VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

VCDAX
0.1%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

VCDAX
0.1%
VGT

-

Financial Services

VCDAX
0.1%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

VCDAX

-

VGT
0.0%

Utilities

VCDAX

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCDAX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCDAX
VCDAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VCDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VCDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCDAX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares (VCDAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCDAXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

3.31

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

10.16

-7.58

VCDAX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCDAX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCDAX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCDAX drawdown since its inception was -61.66%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCDAX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCDAXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.66%

-54.63%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-16.40%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.44%

-27.23%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.51%

-35.07%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-35.07%

-3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-4.18%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-7.95%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

5.34%

-0.25%

Volatility

VCDAX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares (VCDAX) is 6.59%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that VCDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCDAXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

10.66%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

18.19%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

22.44%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.09%

25.50%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

24.78%

-2.23%

VCDAX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCDAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCDAX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCDAX
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%1.82%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.33%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.32%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCDAX and VGT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to VCDAX (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCDAX dropped -61.66% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCDAX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer