PortfoliosLab logo
VBTIX vs. BNDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VBTIX and BNDW is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

VBTIX vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBTIX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.49%
12.03%
CELH
MNST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VBTIX:

1.18

BNDW:

1.35

Sortino Ratio

VBTIX:

1.77

BNDW:

1.98

Omega Ratio

VBTIX:

1.21

BNDW:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

VBTIX:

0.45

BNDW:

0.53

Martin Ratio

VBTIX:

2.99

BNDW:

4.85

Ulcer Index

VBTIX:

2.07%

BNDW:

1.19%

Daily Std Dev

VBTIX:

5.25%

BNDW:

4.28%

Max Drawdown

VBTIX:

-19.01%

BNDW:

-17.22%

Current Drawdown

VBTIX:

-6.32%

BNDW:

-4.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBTIX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 2.32% return.


VBTIX

YTD

3.28%

1M

0.93%

6M

1.18%

1Y

5.97%

5Y*

-0.43%

10Y*

1.43%

BNDW

YTD

2.32%

1M

1.30%

6M

1.42%

1Y

5.49%

5Y*

0.06%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VBTIX vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBTIX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDW's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for BNDW: current value is 0.06%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BNDW: 0.06%
Expense ratio chart for VBTIX: current value is 0.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VBTIX: 0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VBTIX vs. BNDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBTIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VBTIX is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VBTIX is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VBTIX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VBTIX is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VBTIX is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VBTIX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BNDW is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BNDW is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BNDW is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BNDW is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BNDW is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BNDW is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VBTIX vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBTIX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.80, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CELH: -0.80
MNST: 0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for CELH, currently valued at -1.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
CELH: -1.22
MNST: 0.27
The chart of Omega ratio for CELH, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.50
CELH: 0.86
MNST: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
CELH: -0.69
MNST: 0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for CELH, currently valued at -0.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CELH: -0.92
MNST: 0.23

The current VBTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBTIX and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.80
0.08
CELH
MNST

Dividends

VBTIX vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

VBTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than BNDW's 3.94% yield.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VBTIX vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBTIX drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBTIX and BNDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-63.02%
-6.20%
CELH
MNST

Volatility

VBTIX vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBTIX) is NaN%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that VBTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.18%
6.46%
CELH
MNST

User Portfolios with VBTIX or BNDW


NVDA
CELH
SMCI
KO
POOL
BYDDY
MNST
1 / 39

Recent discussions