VBR vs. VTWV
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds from Vanguard - VBR tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index while VTWV tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 11.55%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for VTWV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWV.
Performance
VBR vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 22.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBR having a 11.55% annualized return and VTWV not far behind at 11.39%.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 15.13%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 22.28%
- 6M
- 19.68%
- 1Y
- 44.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
VBR vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 15.13% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 22.28% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and VTWV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VBR and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBR vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
VTWV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
VBR
VTWV
Industrials
VBR
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
VTWV
Technology
VBR
VTWV
Real Estate
VBR
VTWV
Healthcare
VBR
VTWV
Basic Materials
VBR
VTWV
Utilities
VBR
VTWV
Energy
VBR
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
VBR
VTWV
Communication Services
VBR
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
VTWV
VBR vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBR | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 5.20 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 17.77 | -6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBR vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than VTWV's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -45.73% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.64% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -26.72% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -26.72% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -45.73% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -7.79% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.52% | -0.02% |
Volatility
VBR vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.90%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 5.17% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 12.61% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 18.38% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 21.71% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 23.54% | -1.83% |
VBR vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than VTWV's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.71% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VBR and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to VBR (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 11.55% vs 11.39% for VTWV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.61% for VTWV.
VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.10% for VTWV.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer