PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBND vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBND vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VBND has underperformed FALN with an annualized return of 1.29%, while FALN has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.


VBND

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.53%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.59%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
1.29%
ALL TIME*
1.54%

FALN

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.92%
6M
0.86%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
6.24%
ALL TIME*
6.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.72M$18.39M$26.66M
$846.73K$2.16M$1.29M

VBND vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBND
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
-0.59%7.31%1.26%8.16%-14.18%-0.43%5.37%9.50%-0.96%3.15%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
1.86%8.92%7.68%13.47%-13.79%5.40%14.85%17.42%-4.97%8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VBND and FALN is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.36

Over the past year, VBND and FALN have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBND vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VBND
VBND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VBND vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBNDFALNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.57

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.72

6.42

-3.70

VBND vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBND and FALN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBND vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and FALN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBNDFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-29.22%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-3.96%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.60%

-5.92%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

-18.78%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

-29.22%

+10.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.07%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-3.28%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.97%

+0.12%

Volatility

VBND vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) have volatilities of 1.01% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBNDFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.99%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

3.79%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

4.59%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

7.33%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

8.86%

-3.41%

VBND vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBND vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than FALN's 6.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
5.98%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%0.00%
VBND
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
4.35%4.22%4.41%3.88%2.55%1.56%1.98%3.14%2.82%2.00%3.12%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBND and FALN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBND has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to FALN (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs FALN's -29.22%.

On 10-year performance, FALN leads with 6.24% vs 1.29% for VBND. On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FALN has performed better with a 6.24% return vs 1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.

FALN has the higher dividend yield at 5.98%, compared with 4.35% for VBND.

VBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FALN is High Yield Bonds. VBND tracks Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while FALN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.25% for FALN.

FALN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBND and FALN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer