VBK vs. ISCG
VBK (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF) and ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - VBK tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index while ISCG tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBK returned 11.74%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for ISCG. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VBK charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCG.
Performance
VBK vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 12.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBK having a 11.74% annualized return and ISCG not far behind at 11.37%.
VBK
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
ISCG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
VBK vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 17.41% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 12.92% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBK and ISCG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VBK and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBK vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBK
ISCG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VBK
ISCG
Industrials
VBK
ISCG
Healthcare
VBK
ISCG
Consumer Cyclical
VBK
ISCG
Financial Services
VBK
ISCG
Energy
VBK
ISCG
Real Estate
VBK
ISCG
Communication Services
VBK
ISCG
Basic Materials
VBK
ISCG
Consumer Defensive
VBK
ISCG
Utilities
VBK
ISCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBK vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
VBK
ISCG
VBK vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.69 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 10.31 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.70 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.23 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
VBK vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and ISCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -57.72% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -11.43% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -26.71% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.39% | -37.80% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -41.48% | +2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.93% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -11.63% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.98% | +0.01% |
Volatility
VBK vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 4.93%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 4.93% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 13.09% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 18.13% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 22.95% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 23.16% | -0.30% |
VBK vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBK vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ISCG's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, VBK and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VBK has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to ISCG (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs ISCG's -57.72%.
On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.74% vs 11.37% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VBK.
ISCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.
VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VBK and 0.06% for ISCG.
VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBK and ISCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer