PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 12.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBK having a 11.74% annualized return and ISCG not far behind at 11.37%.


VBK

1D
-1.06%
1M
4.84%
YTD
17.41%
6M
16.96%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
11.74%

ISCG

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.92%
6M
12.57%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
17.41%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.92%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and ISCG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2004

0.95

The correlation between VBK and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
ISCG

Technology

25.9%
21.4%

Industrials

24.7%
24.6%

Healthcare

15.3%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.9%

Financial Services

5.6%
10.6%

Energy

4.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

3.9%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.9%

Utilities

1.2%
1.0%

Technology

VBK
25.9%
ISCG
21.4%

Industrials

VBK
24.7%
ISCG
24.6%

Healthcare

VBK
15.3%
ISCG
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
9.6%
ISCG
9.9%

Financial Services

VBK
5.6%
ISCG
10.6%

Energy

VBK
4.8%
ISCG
2.8%

Real Estate

VBK
3.9%
ISCG
5.2%

Communication Services

VBK
3.5%
ISCG
2.8%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.2%
ISCG
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.4%
ISCG
2.9%

Utilities

VBK
1.2%
ISCG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBKISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.69

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

10.31

+0.67

VBK vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBKISCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.70

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.23

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.49

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

VBK vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-57.72%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-11.43%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-26.71%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-37.80%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-41.48%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.93%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-11.63%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.98%

+0.01%

Volatility

VBK vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 4.93%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.93%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

13.09%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

18.13%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

22.95%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

23.16%

-0.30%

VBK vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ISCG's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.56%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VBK and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to ISCG (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.74% vs 11.37% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VBK.

ISCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VBK and 0.06% for ISCG.

VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer