VBK vs. IJT
VBK (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF) and IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - VBK tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index while IJT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBK returned 12.20%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for IJT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IJT.
Performance
VBK vs. IJT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than IJT's 21.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBK having a 12.20% annualized return and IJT not far behind at 11.65%.
VBK
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 18.61%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 33.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
IJT
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 21.75%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
VBK vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 18.61% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 21.75% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBK and IJT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VBK and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBK vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBK
IJT
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
VBK
IJT
Industrials
VBK
IJT
Healthcare
VBK
IJT
Consumer Cyclical
VBK
IJT
Financial Services
VBK
IJT
Energy
VBK
IJT
Real Estate
VBK
IJT
Communication Services
VBK
IJT
Consumer Defensive
VBK
IJT
Basic Materials
VBK
IJT
Utilities
VBK
IJT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBK vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank
VBK
IJT
VBK vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBK | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.75 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 13.11 | -2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBK vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and IJT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBK | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -57.61% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -9.08% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -27.41% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.39% | -29.24% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -42.03% | +3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -10.29% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.59% | +0.46% |
Volatility
VBK vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) at 5.27%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBK | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 5.27% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 12.98% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 17.96% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 21.54% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 23.06% | -0.12% |
VBK vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBK vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison
VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than IJT's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBK and IJT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBK has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to IJT (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs IJT's -57.61%.
On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 12.20% vs 11.65% for IJT. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.
IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.
VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.18% for IJT.
IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBK and IJT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer