PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VASGX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VASGX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VASGX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VASGX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.71%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


VASGX

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.18%
YTD
10.11%
6M
10.76%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
10.71%

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VASGX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VASGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund
10.11%19.65%12.95%18.76%-17.21%14.35%15.45%23.14%-6.89%19.21%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VASGX and QQQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.81

The correlation between VASGX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VASGX vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VASGX
QQQ

Technology

27.4%
53.8%

Financial Services

16.1%
0.2%

Industrials

12.3%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.2%

Communication Services

8.0%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
7.7%

Energy

4.3%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.1%

Utilities

2.7%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.1%

Technology

VASGX
27.4%
QQQ
53.8%

Financial Services

VASGX
16.1%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

VASGX
12.3%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VASGX
9.4%
QQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

VASGX
8.3%
QQQ
4.2%

Communication Services

VASGX
8.0%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

VASGX
4.8%
QQQ
7.7%

Energy

VASGX
4.3%
QQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

VASGX
4.3%
QQQ
1.1%

Utilities

VASGX
2.7%
QQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

VASGX
2.5%
QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VASGX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VASGX
VASGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VASGX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VASGXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.42

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

13.14

+0.21

VASGX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VASGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VASGX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VASGXQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.57

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.80

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.98

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.41

+0.17

Drawdowns

VASGX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VASGX drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VASGX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VASGXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.16%

-82.97%

+31.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.96%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.89%

-22.77%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.43%

-35.12%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.53%

-35.12%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.74%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-32.78%

+25.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.11%

-1.26%

Volatility

VASGX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX) is 3.22%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that VASGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VASGXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

4.51%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

12.10%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

15.94%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

22.37%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.48%

22.29%

-8.81%

VASGX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VASGX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VASGX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

VASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
VASGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund
3.72%4.09%6.15%3.00%2.10%3.54%3.54%2.34%4.36%2.13%2.23%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


VASGX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VASGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VASGX dropped -51.16% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VASGX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer