VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).
VAPX.L and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VAPX.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on May 21, 2013. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both VAPX.L and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VAPX.L or EQQQ.L.
Performance
VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 23.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 7.20%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.24% annualized return.
VAPX.L
0.61%
-1.29%
-1.99%
7.08%
4.99%
7.20%
EQQQ.L
23.19%
4.48%
11.07%
28.53%
20.87%
20.24%
Key characteristics
| VAPX.L | EQQQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.47 | 1.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.75 | 2.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.54 | 2.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.91 | 6.94 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.31% | 4.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.51% | 15.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.88% | -33.75% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.19% | -1.56% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between VAPX.L and EQQQ.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.46% | 3.51% | 4.31% | 3.53% | 2.05% | 3.39% | 3.54% | 3.08% | 2.71% | 3.44% | 2.26% | 1.13% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% | 1.01% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and EQQQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VAPX.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 5.04%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.