VAPX.AS vs. IJR
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (VAPX.AS) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR).
VAPX.AS and IJR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VAPX.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on May 21, 2013. IJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both VAPX.AS and IJR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VAPX.AS or IJR.
Key characteristics
| VAPX.AS | IJR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.15% | 2.30% |
| 1Y Return | 10.26% | 19.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.49% | 1.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.90% | 9.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.99% | 9.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.59 | 1.16 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.55% | 19.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.99% | -58.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.08% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAPX.AS and IJR is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VAPX.AS vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VAPX.AS achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than IJR's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.AS has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 5.99%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VAPX.AS vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAPX.AS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VAPX.AS vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (VAPX.AS) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VAPX.AS vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
VAPX.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than IJR's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.AS Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 2.95% | 3.54% | 4.46% | 3.45% | 2.06% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 3.16% | 2.85% | 3.53% | 3.12% | 1.51% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.29% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.48% | 1.23% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
VAPX.AS vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.AS and IJR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VAPX.AS vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (VAPX.AS) is 3.24%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that VAPX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.