PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VAGP.L vs. BNDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


VAGP.LBNDW
YTD Return-0.10%2.69%
1Y Return4.50%8.64%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.54%-1.67%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.31%0.07%
Sharpe Ratio0.991.64
Sortino Ratio1.462.44
Omega Ratio1.181.29
Calmar Ratio0.250.59
Martin Ratio2.706.08
Ulcer Index1.73%1.32%
Daily Std Dev4.70%4.90%
Max Drawdown-20.46%-17.22%
Current Drawdown-14.92%-6.11%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between VAGP.L and BNDW is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VAGP.L achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 2.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.34%
4.05%
VAGP.L
BNDW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VAGP.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
Expense ratio chart for VAGP.L: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%
Expense ratio chart for BNDW: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAGP.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VAGP.L, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VAGP.L, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VAGP.L, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VAGP.L, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VAGP.L, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.86
BNDW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BNDW, currently valued at 5.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.56

VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGP.L and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.98
1.56
VAGP.L
BNDW

Dividends

VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

VAGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BNDW's 4.15% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
VAGP.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.15%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Drawdowns

VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGP.L and BNDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.40%
-6.11%
VAGP.L
BNDW

Volatility

VAGP.L vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 1.25%. This indicates that VAGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.74%
1.25%
VAGP.L
BNDW