VAC vs. LEN
VAC (Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation) and LEN (Lennar Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — VAC in Resorts & Casinos, LEN in Residential Construction. Over the past 10 years, VAC returned 5.08%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for LEN. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VAC vs. LEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAC achieves a 72.77% return, which is significantly higher than LEN's -18.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VAC has underperformed LEN with an annualized return of 5.08%, while LEN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.78% annualized return.
VAC
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- 6M
- 83.52%
- YTD
- 72.77%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.57%
- 5Y*
- -5.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.33%
LEN
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- 6M
- -23.50%
- YTD
- -18.63%
- 1Y
- -27.57%
- 3Y*
- -11.07%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.85M | $208.11M | $237.44M | |
| $40.23M | $39.18M | $43.68M |
VAC vs. LEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | 72.77% | -32.68% | 9.62% | -35.25% | -18.87% | 24.00% | 7.13% | 85.87% | -47.00% | 61.47% |
LEN Lennar Corporation | -18.63% | -20.80% | -7.32% | 66.92% | -20.64% | 53.99% | 37.97% | 42.96% | -37.91% | 50.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAC and LEN is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2011 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
VAC:
$3.35B
LEN:
$20.45B
VAC:
-$14.70
LEN:
$7.91
VAC:
0.49
LEN:
0.63
VAC:
$4.64B
LEN:
$32.74B
VAC:
$1.07B
LEN:
$1.72B
VAC:
-$215.00M
LEN:
$2.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAC vs. LEN — Risk / Return Rank
VAC
LEN
VAC vs. LEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) and Lennar Corporation (LEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VAC | LEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.61 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | -0.96 | +3.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VAC vs. LEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAC drawdown since its inception was -74.90%, smaller than the maximum LEN drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAC and LEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAC | LEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.90% | -94.28% | +19.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.16% | -41.39% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.06% | -54.51% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.47% | -54.51% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.90% | -58.80% | -16.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.41% | -54.21% | +14.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.09% | -26.38% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.51% | 26.09% | -8.58% |
Volatility
VAC vs. LEN - Volatility Comparison
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to Lennar Corporation (LEN) at 8.75%. This indicates that VAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAC | LEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.89% | 8.75% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.02% | 26.33% | +10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.33% | 36.92% | +17.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 34.75% | +8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.98% | 37.46% | +8.52% |
Dividends
VAC vs. LEN - Dividend Comparison
VAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than LEN's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEN Lennar Corporation | 2.43% | 1.95% | 1.47% | 1.01% | 1.66% | 0.86% | 0.82% | 0.29% | 0.41% | 0.25% | 0.37% | 0.33% |
VAC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | 3.27% | 5.49% | 3.42% | 3.44% | 1.92% | 0.64% | 0.39% | 1.47% | 2.34% | 1.07% | 1.47% | 1.84% |
Financials
VAC vs. LEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation and Lennar Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VAC vs. LEN - Profitability Comparison
VAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of -390.70M and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.9%.
VAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 629.34M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
VAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation reported a net income of 22.00M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
LEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 656.43M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VAC and LEN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAC has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to LEN (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAC dropped -74.90% vs LEN's -94.28%.
VAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAC and LEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer