V3GP.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
V3GP.L and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. V3GP.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on May 20, 2021. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both V3GP.L and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: V3GP.L or VOO.
Key characteristics
| V3GP.L | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 279.34% | 27.26% |
| 1Y Return | 302.92% | 37.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 66.98% | 10.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.20 | 3.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 58.04 | 4.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 8.18 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 123.25 | 4.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 326.79 | 21.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.93% | 1.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 94.57% | 12.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.15% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.73% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3GP.L and VOO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
V3GP.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, V3GP.L achieves a 279.34% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 27.26% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
V3GP.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3GP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
V3GP.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
V3GP.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
V3GP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.77%, more than VOO's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3GP.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing | 109.77% | 4.10% | 96.35% | 71.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
V3GP.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3GP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.15%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GP.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
V3GP.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) is 2.93%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that V3GP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.