V3AM.L vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
V3AM.L and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. V3AM.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both V3AM.L and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: V3AM.L or VT.
Key characteristics
V3AM.L | VT | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 8.87% | 9.80% |
1Y Return | 22.03% | 24.63% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 8.21% | 5.81% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.06 | 2.03 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.62% | 11.58% |
Max Drawdown | -18.83% | -50.27% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3AM.L and VT is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
V3AM.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, V3AM.L achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 9.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
V3AM.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3AM.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
V3AM.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
V3AM.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
V3AM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than VT's 2.02% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 1.33% | 1.45% | 1.70% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 2.02% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
V3AM.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3AM.L drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AM.L and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
V3AM.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.21%. This indicates that V3AM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.