UYM vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
UYM and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UYM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both UYM and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UYM or VGT.
Correlation
The correlation between UYM and VGT is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UYM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UYM:
-1.04
VGT:
-0.29
UYM:
-1.36
VGT:
-0.22
UYM:
0.83
VGT:
0.97
UYM:
-0.89
VGT:
-0.29
UYM:
-2.47
VGT:
-1.20
UYM:
13.68%
VGT:
6.30%
UYM:
32.43%
VGT:
25.73%
UYM:
-92.77%
VGT:
-54.63%
UYM:
-38.03%
VGT:
-25.96%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a -15.92% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -22.93% return. Over the past 10 years, UYM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 5.10%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.
UYM
-15.92%
-22.28%
-34.87%
-32.11%
25.17%
5.10%
VGT
-22.93%
-18.35%
-17.99%
-6.05%
19.72%
17.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UYM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UYM vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UYM
VGT
UYM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UYM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than VGT's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 1.32% | 0.97% | 0.28% | 0.87% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.38% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
UYM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UYM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a higher volatility of 18.30% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 12.42%. This indicates that UYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.