PortfoliosLab logo
UVE vs. AFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UVE and AFL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

UVE vs. AFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (UVE) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UVE:

1.13

AFL:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

UVE:

1.62

AFL:

1.32

Omega Ratio

UVE:

1.25

AFL:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

UVE:

0.79

AFL:

1.68

Martin Ratio

UVE:

5.70

AFL:

3.62

Ulcer Index

UVE:

7.93%

AFL:

5.83%

Daily Std Dev

UVE:

38.69%

AFL:

22.51%

Max Drawdown

UVE:

-99.65%

AFL:

-82.71%

Current Drawdown

UVE:

-30.22%

AFL:

-8.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UVE:

$763.85M

AFL:

$55.98B

EPS

UVE:

$2.31

AFL:

$6.47

PE Ratio

UVE:

11.75

AFL:

16.00

PEG Ratio

UVE:

0.00

AFL:

0.93

PS Ratio

UVE:

0.49

AFL:

3.31

PB Ratio

UVE:

1.79

AFL:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

UVE:

$1.55B

AFL:

$17.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UVE:

$1.55B

AFL:

$13.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

UVE:

$45.57M

AFL:

$4.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVE achieves a 30.65% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, UVE has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 4.14%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


UVE

YTD

30.65%

1M

13.75%

6M

22.46%

1Y

41.77%

3Y*

32.98%

5Y*

13.13%

10Y*

4.14%

AFL

YTD

1.21%

1M

0.57%

6M

-8.16%

1Y

17.58%

3Y*

22.30%

5Y*

26.19%

10Y*

15.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aflac Incorporated

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UVE vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UVE is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UVE is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UVE is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UVE is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UVE is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UVE is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFL is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFL is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFL is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFL is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFL is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFL is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UVE vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (UVE) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the AFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVE and AFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

UVE vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison

UVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than AFL's 2.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UVE
Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.
2.36%3.04%4.01%6.04%3.59%4.24%2.29%1.93%2.52%2.43%2.72%2.69%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.09%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%

Drawdowns

UVE vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVE drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than AFL's maximum drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVE and AFL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

UVE vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (UVE) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 6.60%. This indicates that UVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UVE vs. AFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
394.87M
3.40B
(UVE) Total Revenue
(AFL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UVE vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
-1.5%
(UVE) Gross Margin
(AFL) Gross Margin
UVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 394.87M and revenue of 394.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of -50.00M and revenue of 3.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.5%.

UVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 54.75M and revenue of 394.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 145.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

UVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 41.44M and revenue of 394.87M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 29.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.