UVE vs. AFL
UVE (Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.) and AFL (Aflac Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — UVE in Insurance - Property & Casualty, AFL in Insurance - Life. Over the past 10 years, UVE returned 12.56%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for AFL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UVE vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UVE achieves a 21.47% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, UVE has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 12.56%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.
UVE
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 21.47%
- 6M
- 18.90%
- 1Y
- 51.85%
- 3Y*
- 42.56%
- 5Y*
- 29.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
AFL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
UVE vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. | 21.47% | 65.32% | 36.80% | 58.14% | -33.52% | 18.39% | -43.50% | -24.24% | 41.44% | -0.88% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 7.91% | 8.94% | 28.08% | 17.36% | 26.41% | 34.55% | -13.60% | 18.55% | 6.20% | 29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UVE and AFL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2003 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
UVE:
$9.07
AFL:
$8.76
UVE:
4.49
AFL:
13.44
UVE:
0.04
AFL:
3.48
UVE:
0.55
AFL:
3.42
UVE:
$1.60B
AFL:
$18.22B
UVE:
$346.30M
AFL:
$8.70B
UVE:
$272.42M
AFL:
$6.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UVE vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank
UVE
AFL
UVE vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (UVE) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UVE | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.70 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 4.23 | +1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UVE vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UVE drawdown since its inception was -80.46%, roughly equal to the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVE and AFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UVE | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.46% | -82.71% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -9.11% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.75% | -13.56% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.23% | -19.86% | -34.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.58% | -54.89% | -24.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.88% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.25% | -11.64% | -24.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 3.67% | +4.84% |
Volatility
UVE vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (UVE) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 6.00%. This indicates that UVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UVE | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 6.00% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.79% | 12.21% | +14.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.76% | 17.14% | +19.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.24% | 20.87% | +21.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.34% | 25.75% | +15.59% |
Dividends
UVE vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
UVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than AFL's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% |
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. | 1.89% | 2.28% | 3.66% | 4.82% | 7.27% | 4.53% | 5.10% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.52% | 2.43% | 2.72% |
Financials
UVE vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UVE vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison
UVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 393.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
UVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 73.29M and revenue of 393.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
AFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
UVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.29M and revenue of 393.57M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.
AFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UVE and AFL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UVE has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to AFL (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVE dropped -80.46% vs AFL's -82.71%.
UVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UVE and AFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer