PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTZ vs. STZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTZ vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTZ achieves a 38.41% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -3.60% return.


UTZ

1D
0.07%
1M
70.74%
6M
36.31%
YTD
38.41%
1Y
6.49%
3Y*
-3.22%
5Y*
-7.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.29%

STZ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-4.52%
6M
-15.68%
YTD
-3.60%
1Y
-19.34%
3Y*
-19.75%
5Y*
-8.56%
10Y*
-0.58%
ALL TIME*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$256.34M$282.25M$312.17M
$163.60M$85.46M$38.82M

UTZ vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UTZ
Utz Brands, Inc.
38.41%-32.33%-2.08%3.90%0.91%-26.97%115.77%6.53%-1.03%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
-3.60%-35.99%-7.11%5.83%-6.43%16.12%17.41%19.85%-16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UTZ and STZ is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2018

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTZ:

$1.25B

STZ:

$22.24B

EPS

UTZ:

-$0.07

STZ:

$10.48

PS Ratio

UTZ:

0.86

STZ:

2.50

PB Ratio

UTZ:

1.76

STZ:

2.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTZ:

$1.45B

STZ:

$9.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTZ:

$323.00M

STZ:

$4.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

UTZ:

-$32.85M

STZ:

$3.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTZ vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTZ
UTZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

STZ
STZ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
STZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
STZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
STZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
STZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTZ vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTZSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.91

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.77

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

-1.24

+1.60

UTZ vs. STZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTZ and STZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTZ vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTZ drawdown since its inception was -75.43%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTZ and STZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTZSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.43%

-67.39%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.95%

-25.73%

-24.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.76%

-51.28%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.01%

-51.28%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.51%

-49.25%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.56%

-16.71%

-16.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.74%

15.99%

+15.75%

Volatility

UTZ vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) has a higher volatility of 64.43% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.53%. This indicates that UTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTZSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

64.43%

8.53%

+55.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.33%

22.83%

+50.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.04%

30.31%

+68.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.24%

24.90%

+29.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.86%

27.08%

+19.78%

Dividends

UTZ vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

UTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than STZ's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.15%2.95%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%
UTZ
Utz Brands, Inc.
1.77%2.48%1.72%1.40%1.38%1.28%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UTZ vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Utz Brands, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

UTZ vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Utz Brands, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

UTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Utz Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.90M and revenue of 361.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.3%.

UTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Utz Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.50M and revenue of 361.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 845.30M and revenue of 2.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.8%.

UTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Utz Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 900.00K and revenue of 361.30M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 653.80M and revenue of 2.43B, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UTZ and STZ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTZ has higher volatility (64.43%) compared to STZ (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTZ dropped -75.43% vs STZ's -67.39%.

UTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTZ and STZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer