UTSL vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
UTSL and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTSL is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Utilities Select Sector Index (300%). It was launched on May 3, 2017. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both UTSL and FNGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UTSL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTSL vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 20.69% | 11.59% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | -38.12% | 4.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -38.12% return.
UTSL
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -11.14%
- YTD
- 20.69%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGU
- 1D
- 13.84%
- 1M
- -15.01%
- YTD
- -38.12%
- 6M
- -46.40%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTSL vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UTSL vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
UTSL
FNGU
UTSL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTSL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.23 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.91 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.27 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 0.71 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTSL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.23 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.41 | +0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTSL and FNGU is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UTSL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 1.51% | 1.69% | 1.61% | 3.61% | 1.15% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 5.01% | 1.46% | 0.57% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UTSL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and FNGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTSL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.55% | -60.84% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.94% | -59.55% | +31.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.14% | -53.95% | +42.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -21.77% | -11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 22.28% | -9.98% |
Volatility
UTSL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) is 15.69%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that UTSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTSL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 23.48% | -7.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.12% | 44.72% | -13.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.20% | 77.61% | -30.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.60% | 80.84% | -29.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.39% | 80.84% | -21.45% |