UTL vs. CRF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UTL (Unitil Corporation) is a stock, while CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past 10 years, UTL returned 5.53%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for CRF. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UTL vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unitil Corporation (UTL) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTL achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.76% return. Over the past 10 years, UTL has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 5.53%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.

UTL

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: 0.74%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 2.30%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

CRF

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -3.76%
• 6M: -3.15%
• 1Y: 11.98%
• 3Y*: 15.66%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTL vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTL Unitil Corporation	8.83%	-7.43%	6.33%	5.63%	15.04%	7.31%	-25.94%	25.30%	14.48%	3.69%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.76%	12.46%	44.39%	19.49%	-36.70%	39.73%	28.13%	21.74%	-11.74%	21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between UTL and CRF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992	0.07

Return for Risk

UTL vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTL

UTL Risk / Return Rank: 40
UTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
UTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
UTL Omega Ratio Rank: 36
UTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
UTL Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 10
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTL vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unitil Corporation (UTL) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTL	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	0.78	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.19	1.17	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.16	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	0.81	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	2.65	-2.53

UTL vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTL and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTL vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTL drawdown since its inception was -48.37%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTL and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTL	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.37%	-80.70%	+32.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.26%	-14.88%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.84%	-29.66%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.26%	-43.12%	+14.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.37%	-45.90%	-2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.97%	-5.53%	-6.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.07%	-22.29%	+11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	4.53%	+2.38%

Volatility

UTL vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

Unitil Corporation (UTL) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 3.39%. This indicates that UTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTL	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.45%	3.39%	+3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	13.53%	+2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.68%	15.48%	+6.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.02%	25.08%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.26%	25.87%	+1.39%

Dividends

UTL vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

UTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than CRF's 20.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	20.06%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
UTL Unitil Corporation	3.58%	3.72%	3.14%	3.08%	3.04%	3.31%	3.39%	2.39%	2.88%	3.16%	3.13%	3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTL and CRF in my portfolio?

UTL and CRF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTL or CRF?

UTL has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to CRF (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTL dropped -48.37% vs CRF's -80.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.