UTI vs. MEDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UTI (Universal Technical Institute, Inc.) and MEDP (Medpace Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. UTI operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while MEDP operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, UTI returned 49.26%/yr vs 21.65%/yr for MEDP. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UTI vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTI achieves a 70.42% return, which is significantly higher than MEDP's -19.73% return.

UTI

• 1D: 6.89%
• 1M: 20.12%
• YTD: 70.42%
• 6M: 78.05%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 89.54%
• 5Y*: 49.26%
• 10Y*: 30.83%

MEDP

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 8.10%
• YTD: -19.73%
• 6M: -21.80%
• 1Y: 47.29%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 21.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTI vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTI Universal Technical Institute, Inc.	70.42%	1.63%	105.35%	86.31%	-14.07%	21.05%	-16.21%	111.23%	52.08%	-17.53%
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	-19.73%	69.05%	8.38%	44.31%	-2.40%	56.35%	65.60%	58.81%	45.97%	0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between UTI and MEDP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2016	0.16

The correlation between UTI and MEDP shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap UTI : $2.48B MEDP : $13.06B
EPS UTI : $0.77 MEDP : $15.63
PE Ratio UTI : 58.13 MEDP : 28.84
PEG Ratio UTI : 0.38 MEDP : 0.87
PS Ratio UTI : 2.85 MEDP : 4.96
PB Ratio UTI : 7.30 MEDP : 21.82
Total Revenue (TTM) UTI : $868.99M MEDP : $2.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) UTI : $208.88M MEDP : $778.59M
EBITDA (TTM) UTI : $76.70M MEDP : $572.96M

Return for Risk

UTI vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTI

UTI Risk / Return Rank: 55
UTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
UTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
UTI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
UTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
UTI Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MEDP

MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 68
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTI vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTI	MEDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.69	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	1.70	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.29	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	1.30	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	2.98	-1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTI vs. MEDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the MEDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTI and MEDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTI	MEDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	0.69	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.42	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.66	-0.59

Drawdowns

UTI vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTI drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTI and MEDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTI	MEDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.06%	-42.87%	-53.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.90%	-36.61%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.36%	-39.38%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.19%	-42.87%	-8.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-27.36%	+27.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.69%	-12.89%	-52.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.31%	15.92%	+1.39%

Volatility

UTI vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) has a higher volatility of 21.61% compared to Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) at 7.02%. This indicates that UTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTI	MEDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.61%	7.02%	+14.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.26%	38.13%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.28%	69.32%	-14.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.03%	51.61%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.47%	49.82%	+3.65%

Dividends

UTI vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTI nor MEDP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTI Universal Technical Institute, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	5.15%

Financials

UTI vs. MEDP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a gross profit of -109.80M and revenue of 221.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -49.6%.

MEDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.33M and revenue of 706.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

UTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

MEDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.50M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

UTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a net income of 433.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.

MEDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 123.87M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTI and MEDP in my portfolio?

UTI and MEDP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTI or MEDP?

UTI has higher volatility (21.61%) compared to MEDP (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTI dropped -96.06% vs MEDP's -42.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.