PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTI vs. MEDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTI vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTI achieves a 58.13% return, which is significantly higher than MEDP's 2.07% return.


UTI

1D
5.11%
1M
-14.34%
6M
42.53%
YTD
58.13%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
77.57%
5Y*
42.79%
10Y*
33.55%
ALL TIME*
2.94%

MEDP

1D
-0.66%
1M
2.81%
6M
-2.53%
YTD
2.07%
1Y
35.50%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
26.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$292.28M$219.39M$171.29M
$35.66M$38.67M$49.11M

UTI vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTI
Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
58.13%1.63%105.35%86.31%-14.07%21.05%-16.21%111.23%52.08%-17.53%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.07%69.05%8.38%44.31%-2.40%56.35%65.60%58.81%45.97%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between UTI and MEDP is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2016

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTI:

$2.28B

MEDP:

$16.00B

EPS

UTI:

$0.77

MEDP:

$16.89

PE Ratio

UTI:

53.96

MEDP:

33.94

PEG Ratio

UTI:

0.36

MEDP:

1.02

PS Ratio

UTI:

2.65

MEDP:

6.00

PB Ratio

UTI:

6.78

MEDP:

38.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTI:

$868.99M

MEDP:

$2.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTI:

$208.88M

MEDP:

$800.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

UTI:

$76.70M

MEDP:

$613.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTI vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTI
UTI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
UTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MEDP
MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTI vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTIMEDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.97

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

2.06

-0.25

UTI vs. MEDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the MEDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTI and MEDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTI vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTI drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTI and MEDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIMEDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.06%

-42.87%

-53.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.88%

-36.61%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

-39.38%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.19%

-42.87%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.30%

-7.62%

-11.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.30%

-12.94%

-52.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.94%

17.25%

-1.31%

Volatility

UTI vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) has a higher volatility of 20.94% compared to Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) at 15.99%. This indicates that UTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIMEDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.94%

15.99%

+4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.12%

41.21%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.34%

44.65%

+15.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.40%

52.11%

-3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.52%

49.80%

+2.72%

Dividends

UTI vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTI nor MEDP has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTI
Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%5.15%

Financials

UTI vs. MEDP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

UTI vs. MEDP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

UTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a gross profit of -109.80M and revenue of 221.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -49.6%.

MEDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 201.64M and revenue of 707.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

UTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

MEDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.82M and revenue of 707.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

UTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a net income of 433.00K and revenue of 221.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.

MEDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 121.36M and revenue of 707.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UTI and MEDP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTI has higher volatility (20.94%) compared to MEDP (15.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTI dropped -96.06% vs MEDP's -42.87%.

MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTI and MEDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer