UTI vs. LMB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB).

Performance

UTI vs. LMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UTI vs. LMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTI Universal Technical Institute, Inc.	38.16%	1.63%	105.35%	86.31%	-14.07%	21.05%	-16.21%	111.23%	52.08%	-17.53%
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc.	0.26%	-8.99%	88.12%	336.79%	15.67%	-27.01%	226.19%	2.72%	-73.39%	-1.91%

Fundamentals

EPS UTI : $0.96 LMB : $3.02
PE Ratio UTI : 37.45 LMB : 25.82
PEG Ratio UTI : 0.25 LMB : 0.46
PS Ratio UTI : 2.35 LMB : 1.57
Total Revenue (TTM) UTI : $855.03M LMB : $603.58M
Gross Profit (TTM) UTI : $313.84M LMB : $162.40M
EBITDA (TTM) UTI : $111.66M LMB : $64.27M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTI achieves a 38.16% return, which is significantly higher than LMB's 0.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UTI having a 23.48% annualized return and LMB not far behind at 22.95%.

UTI

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 38.16%
• 6M: 10.91%
• 1Y: 40.58%
• 3Y*: 69.75%
• 5Y*: 43.18%
• 10Y*: 23.48%

LMB

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -14.62%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: -19.64%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 65.24%
• 5Y*: 49.76%
• 10Y*: 22.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UTI vs. LMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTI

UTI Risk / Return Rank: 65
UTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
UTI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
UTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
UTI Martin Ratio Rank: 64

LMB

LMB Risk / Return Rank: 43
LMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
LMB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
LMB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTI vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTI	LMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	0.09	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	0.50	+0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.06	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	0.04	+1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.42	0.07	+2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTI vs. LMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTI and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTI	LMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	0.09	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.83	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.37	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.37	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between UTI and LMB is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UTI vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTI nor LMB has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UTI Universal Technical Institute, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	5.15%
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UTI vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTI drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, which is greater than LMB's maximum drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTI and LMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTI	LMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.06%	-84.10%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.36%	-55.92%	+16.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.19%	-55.97%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.30%	-84.10%	+18.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.98%	-47.80%	+38.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.15%	-31.40%	-34.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.49%	33.49%	-16.00%

Volatility

UTI vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is 14.79%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 16.41%. This indicates that UTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTI	LMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.79%	16.41%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.78%	38.46%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.75%	55.96%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.17%	60.34%	-13.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.53%	61.80%	-8.27%

Financials

UTI vs. LMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 220.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 42.29M and revenue of 184.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.9%.

UTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.69M and revenue of 220.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

LMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.66M and revenue of 184.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

UTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Technical Institute, Inc. reported a net income of 12.83M and revenue of 220.84M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

LMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 8.79M and revenue of 184.58M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.