UTI vs. LMB

In the year-to-date period, UTI achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than LMB's 17.23% return. Over the past 10 years, UTI has underperformed LMB with an annualized return of 11.95%, while LMB has yielded a comparatively higher 30.01% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTI and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither UTI nor LMB has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum UTI drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, which is greater than LMB's maximum drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTI and LMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is 9.88%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 13.62%. This indicates that UTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Technical Institute, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.