USRT vs. ONEQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ).
USRT and ONEQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USRT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. It was launched on May 4, 2007. ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003. Both USRT and ONEQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USRT or ONEQ.
Performance
USRT vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 26.00% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 6.41%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.
USRT
12.77%
-2.83%
14.19%
27.56%
4.98%
6.41%
ONEQ
26.00%
1.92%
12.45%
34.13%
18.40%
16.07%
Key characteristics
| USRT | ONEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.66 | 1.98 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.34 | 2.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.12 | 2.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.62 | 9.86 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.56% | 3.48% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.29% | 17.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.89% | -55.09% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.33% | -2.43% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USRT vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and ONEQ is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USRT vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USRT vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than ONEQ's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.80% | 3.18% | 3.47% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.43% | 3.98% | 3.59% | 3.46% | 3.84% |
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
USRT vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.89%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and ONEQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USRT vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) is 5.03%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that USRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.