PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. IMTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 19.09% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's -0.29% return.


USRT

1D
0.70%
1M
1.10%
6M
17.11%
YTD
19.09%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
6.04%

IMTB

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-0.56%
YTD
-0.29%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USRT vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
19.09%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
-0.29%8.88%1.94%6.10%-12.75%-1.41%6.25%8.62%-0.45%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and IMTB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2016

0.24

The correlation between USRT and IMTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTB
IMTB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IMTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USRT vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USRTIMTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.58

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

4.44

+4.22

USRT vs. IMTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the IMTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and IMTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USRT vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than IMTB's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and IMTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTIMTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-18.15%

-51.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-2.86%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-6.79%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-18.11%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-2.00%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-4.10%

-8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.01%

+1.47%

Volatility

USRT vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) at 1.58%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTIMTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

1.58%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

3.29%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

4.13%

+9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

6.32%

+12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

5.18%

+16.14%

USRT vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USRT vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than IMTB's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
4.55%4.40%4.42%4.13%2.90%2.49%2.63%2.91%3.04%2.75%0.40%0.00%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.54%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


USRT and IMTB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USRT has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to IMTB (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs IMTB's -18.15%.

On 5-year performance, USRT leads with 5.20% vs 0.36% for IMTB. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USRT has performed better with a 5.20% return vs 0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USRT.

IMTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.54% for USRT.

USRT is categorized as REIT, while IMTB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.06% for IMTB.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and IMTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer