PortfoliosLab logo
USPH vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between USPH and COST is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

USPH vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,275.18%
16,332.86%
USPH
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

USPH:

-0.86

COST:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

USPH:

-1.32

COST:

1.96

Omega Ratio

USPH:

0.85

COST:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

USPH:

-0.55

COST:

1.81

Martin Ratio

USPH:

-1.40

COST:

5.32

Ulcer Index

USPH:

20.36%

COST:

5.89%

Daily Std Dev

USPH:

32.90%

COST:

21.91%

Max Drawdown

USPH:

-67.21%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

USPH:

-45.46%

COST:

-6.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

USPH:

$1.10B

COST:

$450.29B

EPS

USPH:

$1.84

COST:

$17.15

PE Ratio

USPH:

39.26

COST:

59.18

PEG Ratio

USPH:

3.01

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

USPH:

1.65

COST:

1.71

PB Ratio

USPH:

2.25

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

USPH:

$515.67M

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

USPH:

$92.72M

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

USPH:

$66.09M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USPH achieves a -16.01% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.29% return. Over the past 10 years, USPH has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 5.72%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.69% annualized return.


USPH

YTD

-16.01%

1M

4.93%

6M

-21.25%

1Y

-28.03%

5Y*

2.29%

10Y*

5.72%

COST

YTD

10.29%

1M

4.58%

6M

7.07%

1Y

30.07%

5Y*

29.12%

10Y*

23.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

USPH vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of USPH is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of USPH is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of USPH is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of USPH is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of USPH is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of USPH is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

USPH vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current USPH Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USPH and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.86
1.39
USPH
COST

Dividends

USPH vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

USPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
USPH
U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.
2.39%1.98%1.85%2.02%1.53%0.27%1.00%0.90%1.11%0.97%1.12%1.14%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

USPH vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USPH drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPH and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-45.46%
-6.26%
USPH
COST

Volatility

USPH vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.91%. This indicates that USPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.21%
5.91%
USPH
COST

Financials

USPH vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
180.45M
63.72B
(USPH) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

USPH vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
18.0%
15.1%
(USPH) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
USPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.53M and revenue of 180.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

USPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. reported an operating income of 14.54M and revenue of 180.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

USPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. reported a net income of 7.44M and revenue of 180.45M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.