USNA vs. VUG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

USNA (USANA Health Sciences, Inc.) is a stock, while VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, USNA returned -10.45%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for VUG. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

USNA vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNA achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, USNA has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of -10.45%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.52% annualized return.

USNA

• 1D: 3.30%
• 1M: 6.18%
• 6M: 5.45%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: -20.86%
• 3Y*: -29.89%
• 5Y*: -24.80%
• 10Y*: -10.45%
• ALL TIME*: 7.35%

VUG

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 8.45%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 23.28%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: 17.52%
• ALL TIME*: 12.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc.	$2.09M	$2.01M	$2.23M
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	$562.97M	$645.16M	$657.53M

USNA vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc.	16.35%	-45.31%	-33.04%	0.75%	-47.43%	31.26%	-1.85%	-33.28%	58.99%	21.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	7.33%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between USNA and VUG is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.35

The correlation between USNA and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

USNA vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USNA

USNA Risk / Return Rank: 25
USNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
USNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
USNA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
USNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
USNA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 37
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USNA vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USNA	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	1.01	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	1.48	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.18	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	1.09	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	3.45	-4.05

USNA vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNA Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNA and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USNA vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNA drawdown since its inception was -94.90%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNA and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNA	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.90%	-50.68%	-44.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.58%	-16.53%	-31.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-74.57%	-22.85%	-51.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.71%	-35.61%	-48.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.60%	-35.61%	-51.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.24%	-3.45%	-79.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-7.08%	-34.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.03%	5.20%	+29.83%

Volatility

USNA vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.95%. This indicates that USNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNA	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.50%	5.95%	+8.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.61%	14.38%	+18.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.79%	17.76%	+28.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.91%	22.52%	+14.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.57%	21.57%	+17.00%

Dividends

USNA vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

USNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNA and VUG in my portfolio?

USNA and VUG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNA or VUG?

USNA has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to VUG (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNA dropped -94.90% vs VUG's -50.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.