USML.L vs. CSPX.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS).
USML.L and CSPX.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USML.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 29, 2019. CSPX.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both USML.L and CSPX.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USML.L or CSPX.AS.
Key characteristics
| USML.L | CSPX.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.14% | 18.65% |
| 1Y Return | 20.99% | 23.74% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.46% | 11.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.96% | 14.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.98 | 2.18 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.69% | 11.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.65% | -33.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.35% | -2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between USML.L and CSPX.AS is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
USML.L vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, USML.L achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.AS's 18.65% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USML.L vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USML.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USML.L vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USML.L vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither USML.L nor CSPX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
USML.L vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USML.L drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, which is greater than CSPX.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML.L and CSPX.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USML.L vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) at 4.27%. This indicates that USML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.