USMF vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
USMF and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USMF is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Multifactor Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2017. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both USMF and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USMF or OMFL.
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and OMFL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
USMF vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
USMF:
1.93
OMFL:
1.00
USMF:
2.66
OMFL:
1.40
USMF:
1.34
OMFL:
1.18
USMF:
3.02
OMFL:
1.06
USMF:
8.63
OMFL:
3.15
USMF:
2.42%
OMFL:
4.50%
USMF:
10.81%
OMFL:
14.15%
USMF:
-36.24%
OMFL:
-33.24%
USMF:
-4.08%
OMFL:
-2.28%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USMF having a 1.73% return and OMFL slightly higher at 1.81%.
USMF
1.73%
2.00%
9.85%
20.16%
10.71%
N/A
OMFL
1.81%
1.33%
10.05%
13.58%
11.86%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USMF vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USMF vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
USMF
OMFL
USMF vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USMF vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, which matches OMFL's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
USMF vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USMF vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 3.97%, while Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.