PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMF vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMF vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.10% return.


USMF

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.76%
YTD
4.36%
6M
4.80%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*

DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMF vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
4.36%4.60%19.65%13.47%-8.82%21.26%12.01%24.06%-4.72%11.27%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%13.49%

Correlation

The correlation between USMF and DGRW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.85

The correlation between USMF and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMF vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMF
DGRW

Technology

35.6%
32.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
7.1%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.3%
12.8%

Industrials

7.8%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
6.7%

Energy

4.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Utilities

2.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.9%
3.3%

Technology

USMF
35.6%
DGRW
32.1%

Financial Services

USMF
11.8%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USMF
11.1%
DGRW
7.1%

Communication Services

USMF
10.3%
DGRW
10.1%

Healthcare

USMF
9.3%
DGRW
12.8%

Industrials

USMF
7.8%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

USMF
5.2%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

USMF
4.1%
DGRW
5.0%

Real Estate

USMF
2.0%
DGRW

-

Utilities

USMF
2.0%
DGRW
0.2%

Basic Materials

USMF
0.9%
DGRW
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMF vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMF vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMFDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.52

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

11.03

-8.10

USMF vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMF and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMFDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.12

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.88

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.86

-0.23

Drawdowns

USMF vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMFDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-32.04%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.30%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-16.21%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-17.27%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.83%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-3.01%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.89%

+0.26%

Volatility

USMF vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 2.30%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMFDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.47%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

7.64%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

9.88%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

13.97%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

16.21%

+0.76%

USMF vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USMF and DGRW have an expense ratio of 0.28%.


Dividends

USMF vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than DGRW's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.32%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMF and DGRW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to USMF (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.17% vs 7.67% for USMF. Both ETFs have the same 0.28% expense ratio. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMF and DGRW have the same expense ratio: 0.28% per year.

USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.

USMF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMF and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer