PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMC vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 35.03% return.


USMC

1D
0.44%
1M
0.13%
6M
9.88%
YTD
8.72%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%

XLE

1D
1.00%
1M
11.89%
6M
18.26%
YTD
35.03%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.10M$6.59M$6.39M
$1.70B$1.73B$1.97B

USMC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
8.72%14.99%29.82%31.57%-17.17%26.30%16.05%27.37%-2.30%5.48%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
35.03%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between USMC and XLE is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017

0.34

The correlation between USMC and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMC vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMC
XLE

Technology

32.1%

-

Financial Services

19.5%

-

Communication Services

12.3%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%

-

Industrials

6.6%

-

Energy

4.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

USMC
32.1%
XLE

-

Financial Services

USMC
19.5%
XLE

-

Communication Services

USMC
12.3%
XLE

-

Healthcare

USMC
9.1%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

USMC
8.5%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

USMC
8.0%
XLE

-

Industrials

USMC
6.6%
XLE

-

Energy

USMC
4.0%
XLE
100.0%

Basic Materials

USMC

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

USMC

-

XLE

-

Utilities

USMC

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USMC
USMC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
USMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USMC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USMCXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.74

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

7.32

-0.54

USMC vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMC and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USMC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMCXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-71.26%

+41.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-14.98%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-20.14%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-26.04%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-4.13%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-17.93%

+13.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

5.62%

-2.87%

Volatility

USMC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 3.47%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMCXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

5.85%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

16.71%

-7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

21.05%

-8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

25.77%

-9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

29.57%

-11.39%

USMC vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than XLE's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
0.76%0.79%1.04%1.35%1.78%1.53%1.55%2.01%2.28%0.24%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.55%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMC and XLE have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to USMC (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 23.67% vs 14.11% for USMC. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 14.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for USMC.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.76% for USMC.

USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMC and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer