USMC vs. XLE
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMC returned 15.68%/yr vs 20.29%/yr for XLE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
USMC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 30.48% return.
USMC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 30.48%
- 6M
- 30.54%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 20.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
USMC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 9.11% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 30.48% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | 6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and XLE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.36 |
The correlation between USMC and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMC vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
XLE
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USMC
XLE
-
Financial Services
USMC
XLE
-
Communication Services
USMC
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
USMC
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
XLE
-
Healthcare
USMC
XLE
-
Industrials
USMC
XLE
-
Energy
USMC
XLE
Basic Materials
USMC
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
USMC
-
XLE
-
Utilities
USMC
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
XLE
USMC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.20 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 2.83 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.88 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 11.35 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.20 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.78 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.31 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
USMC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -71.26% | +41.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -12.05% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -20.14% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | -26.04% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.35% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -17.98% | +13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 4.12% | -1.43% |
Volatility
USMC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 2.49%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 8.19% | -5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 16.56% | -7.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 20.53% | -8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 26.01% | -9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 29.59% | -11.34% |
USMC vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than XLE's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.57% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMC and XLE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to USMC (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.29% vs 15.68% for USMC. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.29% return vs 15.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for USMC.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.
USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMC and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer