USHF.L vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Scientific Beta HFE US Equity 6F EW UCITS ETF (USHF.L) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
USHF.L and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USHF.L is a passively managed fund by FundLogic that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Dec 6, 2017. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both USHF.L and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USHF.L or IWM.
Key characteristics
| USHF.L | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.90% | 9.00% |
| 1Y Return | 17.14% | 20.15% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.16% | 0.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.52% | 8.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.40 | 0.88 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.53% | 21.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.86% | -59.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.28% | -6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between USHF.L and IWM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
USHF.L vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, USHF.L achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 9.00% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USHF.L vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
USHF.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USHF.L vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Scientific Beta HFE US Equity 6F EW UCITS ETF (USHF.L) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USHF.L vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
USHF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USHF.L Morgan Stanley Scientific Beta HFE US Equity 6F EW UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
USHF.L vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USHF.L drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHF.L and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USHF.L vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Scientific Beta HFE US Equity 6F EW UCITS ETF (USHF.L) is 4.31%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that USHF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.