PortfoliosLab logo
USBF vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between USBF and VOO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

USBF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF (USBF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


USBF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

5.53%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

13.29%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

USBF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

USBF vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of USBF is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of USBF is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of USBF is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of USBF is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of USBF is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of USBF is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

USBF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF (USBF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

USBF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

USBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
USBF
iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF
1.37%2.90%4.27%2.83%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

USBF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

USBF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...