USBF vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF (USBF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
USBF and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USBF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock USD Systematic Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 12, 2021. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both USBF and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USBF or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between USBF and VOO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
USBF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
USBF
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
VOO
4.61%
2.59%
10.08%
25.10%
14.79%
13.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USBF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USBF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USBF vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
USBF
VOO
USBF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF (USBF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USBF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
USBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBF iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF | 2.50% | 2.90% | 4.27% | 2.83% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
USBF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
USBF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Systematic Bond ETF (USBF) is 0.00%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that USBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.