PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAWX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAWX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Sustainable World Fund (USAWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAWX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, USAWX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.54%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


USAWX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.65%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.30%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
12.54%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAWX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAWX
USAA Sustainable World Fund
12.50%19.39%18.13%24.65%-19.97%17.68%15.73%32.11%-9.81%23.93%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between USAWX and SCHG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.86

The correlation between USAWX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAWX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAWX
USAWX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
USAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAWX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Sustainable World Fund (USAWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAWXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.51

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.28

5.04

+9.24

USAWX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAWX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAWXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.60

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.70

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.87

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.84

-0.30

Drawdowns

USAWX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAWX drawdown since its inception was -51.65%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAWX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAWXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.65%

-34.59%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-16.41%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.27%

-23.39%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.47%

-34.59%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-34.59%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.78%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-5.20%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

4.90%

-2.83%

Volatility

USAWX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Sustainable World Fund (USAWX) is 3.38%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that USAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAWXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.61%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

11.62%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

15.50%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

22.27%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

21.55%

-2.91%

USAWX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAWX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAWX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

USAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
USAWX
USAA Sustainable World Fund
10.35%11.65%6.66%1.03%2.88%18.85%4.70%41.19%7.16%4.40%2.85%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAWX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to USAWX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAWX dropped -51.65% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

USAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAWX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer