USAUX vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
USAUX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Oct 19, 1981. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
USAUX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USAUX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAUX USAA Aggressive Growth Fund | -9.21% | 16.98% | 33.63% | 48.36% | -35.30% | 16.68% | 41.82% | 23.23% | -0.75% | 30.12% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 0.61% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAUX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, USAUX has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 13.97%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
USAUX
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -9.92%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 21.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USAUX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAUX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USAUX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
USAUX
QYLD
USAUX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAUX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.00 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.61 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.57 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.76 | 10.32 | -6.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAUX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.00 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between USAUX and QYLD is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USAUX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
USAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than QYLD's 11.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAUX USAA Aggressive Growth Fund | 4.88% | 4.43% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 2.37% | 11.36% | 0.18% | 20.25% | 18.58% | 9.19% | 7.42% | 6.80% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.85% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
USAUX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAUX drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAUX and QYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAUX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.19% | -24.75% | -51.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.09% | -10.84% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.84% | -24.61% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -24.75% | -19.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.82% | -1.84% | -11.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.80% | -3.89% | -22.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 1.65% | +3.46% |
Volatility
USAUX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.90%. This indicates that USAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USAUX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 4.90% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 7.50% | +5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 16.43% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 14.84% | +9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 15.51% | +7.30% |