PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAUX vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAUX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAUX achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, USAUX has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 15.69%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.


USAUX

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
2.31%
6M
0.85%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
15.69%

QYLD

1D
0.56%
1M
1.12%
YTD
8.25%
6M
7.89%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAUX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAUX
USAA Aggressive Growth Fund
2.31%16.98%33.63%48.36%-35.30%16.68%41.82%23.23%-0.75%30.12%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
8.25%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between USAUX and QYLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.81

The correlation between USAUX and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAUX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAUX
USAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
USAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
USAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAUX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USAUXQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.51

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.46

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

24.33

-21.85

USAUX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAUX and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USAUX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAUX drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAUX and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAUXQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.19%

-24.75%

-51.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-4.97%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-19.06%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.84%

-24.61%

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.84%

-24.75%

-19.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-1.77%

-5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.68%

-3.82%

-22.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

0.91%

+4.55%

Volatility

USAUX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.78%. This indicates that USAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAUXQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

4.78%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

8.45%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

9.69%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

14.84%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

15.55%

+7.35%

USAUX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAUX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAUX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

USAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than QYLD's 11.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.64%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
USAUX
USAA Aggressive Growth Fund
4.33%4.43%5.15%0.00%2.37%11.36%0.18%20.25%18.58%9.19%7.42%6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAUX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAUX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to QYLD (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAUX dropped -76.19% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAUX and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer