USAUX vs. QYLD

In the year-to-date period, USAUX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, USAUX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 5.31%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

USAUX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current USAUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAUX and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

USAUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.85%.

The maximum USAUX drawdown since its inception was -75.97%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAUX and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that USAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.