USAUX vs. NEA

In the year-to-date period, USAUX achieves a -8.55% return, which is significantly lower than NEA's -1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, USAUX has outperformed NEA with an annualized return of 4.31%, while NEA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current USAUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the NEA Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAUX and NEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

USAUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%.

The maximum USAUX drawdown since its inception was -75.97%, which is greater than NEA's maximum drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAUX and NEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) at 7.18%. This indicates that USAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.