PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAU vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAU vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAU achieves a -33.13% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -6.13% return.


USAU

1D
-3.99%
1M
-21.29%
6M
-25.14%
YTD
-33.13%
1Y
25.17%
3Y*
42.99%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
-13.35%
ALL TIME*
-14.90%

GLDM

1D
-1.46%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-16.53%
YTD
-6.13%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$263.44M$251.25M$317.77M
$3.24M$3.35M$3.54M

USAU vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USAU
U.S. Gold Corp.
-33.13%216.64%44.24%-11.46%-46.49%-45.80%104.32%-10.00%-29.13%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.13%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between USAU and GLDM is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.37

The correlation between USAU and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAU vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USAU
USAU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
USAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USAU vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USAUGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.88

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

1.90

-0.71

USAU vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAU and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USAU vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAU and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAUGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-26.27%

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.03%

-26.27%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.03%

-26.27%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.83%

-26.27%

-46.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-24.94%

-75.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.25%

-6.56%

-76.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.75%

12.12%

+10.63%

Volatility

USAU vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) has a higher volatility of 15.93% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 6.35%. This indicates that USAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAUGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.93%

6.35%

+9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.73%

23.37%

+23.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.59%

27.92%

+37.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.31%

18.39%

+44.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.15%

17.10%

+65.05%

Dividends

USAU vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither USAU nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USAU and GLDM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAU has higher volatility (15.93%) compared to GLDM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAU dropped -99.99% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAU and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer