PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAU vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USAU vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USAU vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USAU
U.S. Gold Corp.
-21.74%216.64%44.24%-11.46%-46.49%-45.80%104.32%-10.00%-29.13%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
8.57%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAU achieves a -21.74% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.


USAU

1D
8.50%
1M
-30.00%
YTD
-21.74%
6M
-7.83%
1Y
67.11%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
-15.22%

GLDM

1D
3.77%
1M
-10.99%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.24%
1Y
49.77%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
21.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAU vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAU
USAU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
USAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
USAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAU vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAUGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

1.82

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

2.25

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.71

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.88

10.04

-6.17

USAU vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAU and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAUGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.82

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.25

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

1.09

-1.28

Correlation

The correlation between USAU and GLDM is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

USAU vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither USAU nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

USAU vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAU and GLDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USAUGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-21.63%

-78.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.07%

-19.14%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.58%

-20.92%

-55.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-13.19%

-86.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.10%

-6.04%

-77.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.72%

5.16%

+10.56%

Volatility

USAU vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) has a higher volatility of 18.25% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 11.01%. This indicates that USAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USAUGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.25%

11.01%

+7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.44%

24.07%

+25.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.99%

27.57%

+43.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.78%

17.65%

+45.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.64%

16.77%

+69.87%