CCJ vs. URNM
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM).
URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCJ or URNM.
Key characteristics
| CCJ | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.24% | -4.23% |
| 1Y Return | 24.67% | 0.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 25.90% | 0.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.65 | 0.13 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 0.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.06 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.84 | 0.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.02 | 0.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 14.00% | 16.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.76% | 40.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.87% | -42.55% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.22% | -21.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and URNM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CCJ vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 26.24% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's -4.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCJ vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCJ vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than URNM's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 3.79% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.87%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and URNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCJ vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) at 10.16%. This indicates that CCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.