PortfoliosLab logo
CCJ vs. URNM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CCJ and URNM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CCJ vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
378.27%
213.38%
CCJ
URNM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCJ:

-0.20

URNM:

-0.74

Sortino Ratio

CCJ:

0.05

URNM:

-0.93

Omega Ratio

CCJ:

1.01

URNM:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

CCJ:

-0.24

URNM:

-0.60

Martin Ratio

CCJ:

-0.49

URNM:

-1.14

Ulcer Index

CCJ:

19.43%

URNM:

26.93%

Daily Std Dev

CCJ:

48.33%

URNM:

41.59%

Max Drawdown

CCJ:

-87.86%

URNM:

-50.78%

Current Drawdown

CCJ:

-28.05%

URNM:

-40.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's -15.73% return.


CCJ

YTD

-14.40%

1M

3.19%

6M

-18.06%

1Y

-10.69%

5Y*

35.00%

10Y*

10.88%

URNM

YTD

-15.73%

1M

1.92%

6M

-29.35%

1Y

-31.52%

5Y*

23.07%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCJ vs. URNM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCJ is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCJ is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCJ is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCJ is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of URNM is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of URNM is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of URNM is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCJ vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CCJ, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CCJ: -0.20
URNM: -0.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CCJ: 0.05
URNM: -0.93
The chart of Omega ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CCJ: 1.01
URNM: 0.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for CCJ, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CCJ: -0.24
URNM: -0.60
The chart of Martin ratio for CCJ, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CCJ: -0.49
URNM: -1.14

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and URNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.20
-0.74
CCJ
URNM

Dividends

CCJ vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than URNM's 3.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.26%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
3.76%3.17%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCJ vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and URNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-28.05%
-40.60%
CCJ
URNM

Volatility

CCJ vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) have volatilities of 16.91% and 16.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.91%
16.68%
CCJ
URNM