URA vs. UGA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA).
URA and UGA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. UGA is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. It was launched on Feb 26, 2008. Both URA and UGA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or UGA.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and UGA is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
URA vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
URA:
-0.28
UGA:
-0.62
URA:
-0.14
UGA:
-0.72
URA:
0.98
UGA:
0.92
URA:
-0.14
UGA:
-0.53
URA:
-0.64
UGA:
-1.56
URA:
17.48%
UGA:
10.53%
URA:
39.37%
UGA:
26.73%
URA:
-93.54%
UGA:
-86.59%
URA:
-72.21%
UGA:
-28.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly higher than UGA's -9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 4.23%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.86% annualized return.
URA
-4.22%
23.20%
-11.80%
-14.47%
23.11%
4.23%
UGA
-9.30%
-1.82%
-8.56%
-15.61%
32.29%
3.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URA vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. UGA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
URA
UGA
URA vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URA vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 2.99% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than UGA's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and UGA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URA vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 14.89% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 8.79%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.