URA vs. SIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL).
URA and SIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. SIL is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Stuttgart Solactive AG Global Silver Miners (USD). It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. Both URA and SIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or SIL.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and SIL is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
URA vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
URA:
-0.22
SIL:
0.52
URA:
0.03
SIL:
1.09
URA:
1.00
SIL:
1.13
URA:
-0.09
SIL:
0.38
URA:
-0.38
SIL:
2.19
URA:
17.72%
SIL:
11.09%
URA:
39.19%
SIL:
39.09%
URA:
-93.54%
SIL:
-82.99%
URA:
-69.66%
SIL:
-50.14%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 4.98%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.51% annualized return.
URA
4.59%
23.23%
-5.37%
-8.48%
26.36%
4.98%
SIL
24.58%
-4.09%
14.98%
20.11%
3.84%
4.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URA vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. SIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
URA
SIL
URA vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
URA vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than SIL's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 2.73% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.93% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.22% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% | 0.08% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than SIL's maximum drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and SIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
URA vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 7.22%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 11.93%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...