URA vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
URA and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both URA and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or QQQ.
Performance
URA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 4.12%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.95% annualized return.
URA
9.52%
-6.34%
-7.12%
14.66%
25.86%
4.12%
QQQ
21.78%
1.15%
10.25%
29.54%
20.42%
17.95%
Key characteristics
| URA | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.46 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.88 | 2.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.22 | 2.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.34 | 7.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 12.21% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.75% | 17.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.54% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -68.05% | -3.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URA vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and QQQ is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than QQQ's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.63% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% | 0.54% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.62%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.